Volunteers
are so varied they’re difficult to count as a single group. They’re
householders helping to set up a Neighbourhood Watch; pub landlords working
together to keep licensed premises safe; victim support groups using first hand
experience to help others; Special Constables; campaigners for improved road safety; lawyers working pro bono to provide access to justice
that would otherwise be denied and many, many more.
Having been a volunteer and helped run a voluntary organisation, you might expect me to
support the so-called ‘Big Society’ ideas promoted by Cameron's coalition.
Well,
yes and no – in that order.
Local
and national, charities, campaign groups, trade unions and reformers have one
thing in common; they run on effort and time given freely. They form a vital thread
running through civilised society. They deserve our thanks and recognition. The Games Makers at the Olympics are a fantastic example of this.
They’ve
brought change and improvement that, fortunately, we can take for granted –
everything from free family planning advice to rights at work, from hospital
transport to the army reserve, the protection of natural environments to
looking after our historic buildings.
Work
on issues like these was first started, campaigned for or provided, not by people
doing it for money, personal gain or fame. It was usually by those driven by
unwavering convictions; that what they were doing was right and much needed by
others.
They’re often pioneers, leading the
way in innovation, changing minds, offering fresh outlooks, setting new norms
and standards - think HIV awareness, Women's Aid, international debt relief -
even promoting healthy eating.
That’s why I'm so sad to see the
damage this Government’s doing under Cameron’s slogan of “Big Society” and
determined to change it.
Volunteers
are called on to step in when vital services are deliberately withdrawn. Many charities are being turned into
businesses, to deliver what were previously public services; multinational private
companies exploit others to ‘sweeten’ their bids for profitable government
contracts.
Local
voluntary sector groups, grant-aided by councils, face a squeeze on funding. For too many youngsters, doing for free what
was previously paid work is becoming the only route into employment. Basic
rights, of the poorest among us, to nutrition and shelter are no longer guaranteed
and are becoming ever more dependent on charity.
These
are not simply questions of cash and resources, they’re matters of political
choice and priorities.
Just last year Suffolk Conservatives
decided to scrap school crossing patrols to save £170,000, despite having £millions
tucked away. If people were concerned
about road safety outside schools, volunteers would step in, That was their
thinking.
In the face of countywide protests
they eventually backtracked. “The pain probably wasn’t worth the gain on this
one” said their leader - though crossing patrols have since gone down by a
third.
I think their cynicism with
children’s crossings forfeited their right to speak credibly to the people of
Suffolk about both community safety and the value of volunteers. Regardless of the
risks to schoolchildren, had there not been a public outcry, they’d have been
happy to get away with it.
Regrettably, that's the reality of
the Conservative's 'Big Society', the part I oppose and resist; it isn't a
voluntary sector that I recognise, want to be part of and to promote.
Nor is it, I’m pleased to hear from
many of our valuable volunteers, one that they want to promote either. Do you?